Patella Tendinopathy
Where is patella tendinopathy painful? (Body Chart)

What are the classical features of patella tendinopathy?
Age: Younger population (18-35)
Gender: Males have a higher prevalence compared to females
– Sport: increased prevalence in sports with high tendon load (plyometric) including basketball, volleyball, netball, high jump, soccer, football
Where is patella tendinopathy painful?
– Anterior aspect of the knee
– Will report symptoms at the inferior pole of the patella and always superior to the tibial tuberosity
– Pain will always stay local, if diffuse consider a differential diagnosis
Characteristics of symptoms for patella tendinopathy
– Very localised
– Stiffness type pain
– Dull aching normal especially in AM or after provocative activity
– Will settle with rest but can take up to 24 hours
Typical activity capability/restriction for clients with patella tendinopathy
– Progressive with restriction with activities that require high spring loads of the lower limb
– Limitations in running, jumping, hopping, change of direction and acceleration
– Inhibit or reduced performance in sport
Behaviour of symptoms for patella tendinopathy
Agg: jumping, change of direction, decelerating, decline (stairs/walking) running, sitting with knees bent, crossing legs kneeling
Ease: sit with legs out straight or laying down, rest, NSAIDs,
24 hours: AM stiffness <30min and pain, warm-up effect phenomena with cool down effect
Typical history of a client with patella tendinopathy
– Associated with physically active individuals
– Acute increase in loading // commonly increased sport participation or training, always check for multiple sports due to patient demographic
– Typical ‘tendon signs’ (AM stiffness, warm-up phenomenon, cool down effect)
– Onset with energy-storing loads
– Can be insidious or acute with presentation
– Check for history of tendon issues
Pathobiological mechanisms behind patella tendinopathy
– Nociceptive with acute presentation (more commonly a reactive presentation)
– The more degenerative the presentation the increased likelihood of nociplastic pain mechanisms
– Also be mindful of the presence of nociplastic if long term rehabilitation
Proposed pathology underlying patella tendinopathy
Thought to be an imbalance between the capacity of the tendon and the load that is being placed through it. An example of this is the Cook and Purdham paradigm.
Reactive Tendinopathy
– sudden increase in relative load
– leads to high levels of pain and functional decline
– commonly younger individuals
Degenerative Tendinopathy
– sustained period of poor tendon health leading to structural changes in the tendon
– has mechanical changes with reduced stiffness and strength
– can be both symptomatic and asymptomatic
Reactive on degenerative is the most common
Physical impairments & associated structure/tissue sources (ie P/E findings)
Local:
– Tenderness on palpation of the PT // especially at the inferior pole
– quads sensitivity and/or wastage
– Knee extension contraction // painful but not always, should be worse when lengthened due to increased compressive forces
– Thickened patellar tendon
– may have some local swelling, no joint swelling
Remote:
– glutes sensitivity to palpation
– femoral nerve sensitivity
– Increased prevalence of reduced strength in other lower limb muscles (calves, quads, glutes)
– tightness in anterior and lateral hip compartments
Functional:
– Tip: therapist should sequentially increase tendon load with functional activities (ie DL squat, SL squat, jumping, hopping, plyos)
– Isometric loading test
– decline squat test
Typical contributing factors to patella tendinopathy
– Maladaptive biomechanics
– Weight
– BMI
– Waist to hip ratio
– Leg length differential
– reduced quads length
– Reduced arch height
– Reduced hamstring length
– Reduced quads strength
– Poor vertical jump performance
Relevant precautions/ contraindications to P/E and treatment
– Severity and irritability
– Consider history and type of tendon (reactive vs degenerative) when considering how aggressive to be with testing
– ie if degenerative want to be cautious of spikes in loaded activities especially in relation to baseline (chance of rupture)
– Absolute rest is contraindicated
Relevant diagnostic imaging for patella tendinopathy
Ultrasound: is adequate to make diagnosis // more cost-effective
MRI: gold standard
Doppler: can be used to assess vascular changes
– Note that both have low sensitivity but high specificity so consider in the context of your patient
– 50% of asymptomatic plays in high patella tendon loading sports have abnormalities on imaging
Typical prognosis for patella tendinopathy
– The earlier treatment is started the more positive the prognosis
– 3-18 months according to evidence
– is estimated on the level of dysfunction of the individual and also the demand on the athlete’s sport
– 1/3 of athletes did not return to their sport within 6 months
– 53% of athletes retired from their sport secondary to the pathology
Management/treatment selection for patella tendinopathy
High-level evidence:
Relative load reduction:
– can be done in numerous ways (training, gametime, or adjustment of high peak force activities)
– attempt to optimise energy storage of tendon in this process
Isometric exercises (Spanish squat or wall squat)
– evidence to suggest helpful with pain reduction and improves motor drive (5 x 45″ holds with 2 min in between @ 70% MVC)
Strengthening
– Place high emphasis on calf and glutes as both have a key role in attenuating forces whilst landing
– Quads used to prevent unloading weakness and atrophy (not associated with reduced pain or increased performance)
Energy storage
– emphasis on later stage rehab
– try to make it as sport-specific as possible
– introduce gradually and ensure ample rest period
Pain
– evidence shows exercising with pain isn’t contraindicated however apply to the patient circumstance
– NSAIDs is shown to have a positive effect on reactive patellar tendinopathies
Low-level evidence
Taping
– study showed slight pain reduction // no preferred direction as placebo tape same effect as inferiorly directed tape
Manual therapy
– friction historically a popular treatment // no evidence to support and can cause irritation to the area
– some logic in the soft tissue work of local muscle groups however no evidence to support the benefit
Differential diagnosis for patella tendinopathy
– Infrapatellar bursitis // compression and inflammatory signs
– PFPS // PFJ assessment, compression with wind up
– Fat Pad // palpation and Hoffa’s test
– Referred from hip // clear hip tests
– Referral from Lx // neurological and lumbar spine assessment
Imaging
– avulsion of the patella tendon
– Tib plateau fracture
– Stress fracture of the patella
– Osteochondritis Desiccans
Subjective exam special questions
– Cancer
– patella instability (dislocations)
References
Bahr R. The IOC manual of sports injuries. 1st ed. Sweden: International Olympic Commitee; 2012.
Brukner P, Khan K. Clinical sports medicine (volume 1 injuries). 5th ed. Australia: McGraw-Hill Education; 2017.
Everhart, J.S., Cole, D., Sojka, J.H., Higgins, J.D., Magnussen, R.A., Schmitt, L.C. and Flanigan, D.C., 2017. Treatment options for patellar tendinopathy: a systematic review. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 33(4), pp.861-872.
Larsson, M.E., Käll, I. and Nilsson-Helander, K., 2012. Treatment of patellar tendinopathy—a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy, 20(8), pp.1632-1646.
Malliaras, P., Cook, J., Purdam, C. and Rio, E., 2015. Patellar tendinopathy: clinical diagnosis, load management, and advice for challenging case presentations. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy, 45(11), pp.887-898.
Van der Worp, H., van Ark, M., Roerink, S., Pepping, G.J., van den Akker-Scheek, I. and Zwerver, J., 2011. Risk factors for patellar tendinopathy: a systematic review of the literature. British journal of sports medicine, 45(5), pp.446-452.